Dreger’s claims that I have made “explicit threats” against her are patent nonsense. The all-transgender is obviously a disingenuous tactic.
Dreger just needed a nemesis to inject herself into this faded controversy and to make her involvement more melodramatic.
In case you don't recall, in that message you praised her work, Blanchard's work, and clearly described yourself and other trans women as autogynophiles  --the concept or the identity.
Dreger’s academic influence had faded by 2006, however.
She claimed she wanted to spend more time with her son and was “exhausted” , a group from which she was about to resign.
the best way to do it is the one-two punch: publish in a medical journal, and then make as big a media stink about it as you can, for example, by writing a national editorial about it, or by using relationships you’ve developed with reporters. In 2007, Bailey and Dreger fed him Dreger's unpublished apologia in hopes of getting Carey to print a story just as the IASR annual sexology conference started.
Carey’s bisexuality piece was similarly timed in 2005, but this time it appears his Timeline and correspondence Below are the seven emails Alice Dreger and I exchanged, unabridged and chronologically ordered with contextualization and annotation.
Dreger’s gossipy, partisan hit piece is certainly not newsworthy, but Dreger is pushing hard to get her media connections to cover this non-event.
She explains how to manipulate reporters on her website: …
We take no responsibility for the content on any website which we link to, please use your own discretion while surfing the links.
Home Made Postings has a zero-tolerance policy against ILLEGAL pornography.
Bailey had no problems with mocking gender-variant children in his lectures , so I responded in kind.